Category Archives: Sage 50 (formerly Peachtree)

Sage 50 Budgeting Function

Using the budgeting function of Sage 50 (formerly Peachtree) is efficient and hassle-free.

The functionality is found under the Maintain menu, right below Chart of Accounts. You’ll open that window, and give your budget a name.

The quickest way to start is to use the ‘Autofill’ option in the top menu bar, which populates your current budget with some other data set. Options include using transaction data from Sage 50 (such as current year actual or actual of a prior year), or using budget data (from the current budget in process or some other budget). Using last year actual transaction data for instance, it fills in only those accounts with activity the prior year, with amounts equaling those prior year transaction, in the months that those transactions took place. Then you can modify those amounts.

The default user interface while you are in the budget is to present you with ‘quick action’ buttons – copy, save and adjust. The copy copies the amount in the cell you are in (or a group of cells you select), paste lets you paste that/those amount(s) in any other cells you choose. Adjust lets you modify the current cell contents in one of two ways: you can modify it by an amount you specify, or you can round that amount to the nearest dollar, or hundred dollars, or thousand dollars.

The other main expeditious way to start the budget process is to import the numbers from an existing spreadsheet. More on that in a later post.

Once you have a budget in place, you can use the provided income statements with budget data, modifying them (see earlier post) as needed. When you have multiple budgets in use, the initial window after you select a financial report gives you an opportunity to select which report to incorporate in to that report.

You can have multiple budgets for a given year, for instance an overall organizational budget as well as particular subset budgets, such as for particular projects or particular grants.

Ideally the organizational budget exactly matches the sum of all the subset budgets of course, but that is quite ambitious and labor-intensive. Especially since often the grant budgets (for instance) are for different periods than the fiscal year, and are very dependent on reality adhering to plan. When reality differs from the original plan, the grant budgets need to be modified as far as timing of amounts and amounts per category – at least internally in order to manage remaining spending (per category, or as a whole) to the budget. When the deviations from plan are significant (such as due to Covid, or a governmental shutdown), then the budget may need to be officially modified with the grant funds provider – perhaps extending the time period of the grant out farther, or reducing amounts allocated to travel and increasing other amounts.

Those project budget activities are necessary, often even to manage ‘small’ amounts. However the overall organizational budget is often not so fine-grained. A specific revenue line in the overall budget may consist of multiple grants, and changes in each of them may cancel out each other. Expense lines in the organizational budget may consist of amounts funded by grants as well as amounts funded by donations.

However when a finance person is talking to a program person about differences from budget, it is crucial that they both understand what budget they are talking about. The grant budgets need to be first priority and very actively managed. If a finance person is speaking about differences from the organizational budget, and the program person thinks they are talking about the project budget, consequences can be non-optimal.

More on budget functionalities in future posts!

Leave a comment

Filed under Accounting, Auditing, Business, Entrepreneurship, Financial Reporting, NonProfits, Sage 50 (formerly Peachtree), Software

Sage 50: Modifying Financial Statements

The interface in Sage 50 (formerly Peachtree, originated by Peachtree Software based in Atlanta, Ga) for modifying financial statements is not pretty, it doesn’t have colors swirling around, it doesn’t have the soft, plastic feel that so many things do these days.

But it works very well, and it is easy to use.

Basic steps:

Click on ‘Design’ in the top menu bar (it has a color palette as the icon image), and that opens a screen with the format design ready to be modified.

On the left side of each line of the format definition is a description of what kind of line that line is:

Text – Body – Header lines (above groupings of accounts), space between sections

Line Description – content lines with account numbers, descriptions, and dollar amounts

Total – includes the level of that section, with the smallest number being the section total, and then the totals including more sections are set to higher total level. I’ll expand on this in the future.

In order to break one section of the report into more detail sections, you can add text body lines, then add the line description and specify the account numbers for that section. Then add the total, with the correct level. Then adjust the account numbers in the line description of the original section to be the correct subset, and modify the total level if needed. Save the report with a descriptive name.

In particular, you can copy (right click for menu, or using keyboard shortcuts) the type of line that you want in your new section from an existing section, then position your cursor on the line below where you want your new line, and paste.

In the header line property window, it will default to center alignment, you probably want to change that to left alignment.

In the account number property window, you can type in the beginning account number and ending account number, or you can use the lookup feature to select those beginning and ending account numbers, or you can use the section below that which lets you indicate type of account for that section of the report. The description for each account line will be the text in your chart of accounts. You have a choice of how each set of accounts is presented: Detail, Rollup, Summary, or ‘No’. I’ll talk more about that in a later posting.

The ‘Preview’ icon in the top bar lets you see the effect of your changes, then you can click ‘Design’ to return.

The ongoing challenge, once you start selecting the account numbers for each section in this kind of customized report is that there is the danger of adding a new account in to your chart of accounts, and forgetting to also add it in to your financial statement. For this reason, once you start to use customized reports, it’s always good to also run a vanilla, un-customized report as part of your review process to identify any amounts/accounts missed right away.

Nonprofit board members on the Finance Committee could consider asking for income statements in unmodified format in some situations, to compare as well.

Report groups are also available for more efficient month-end processing. Sage 50 financial reports export to Excel well, and also provide drill-down capabilities.

Efficient and effective! (Hmm, this is a bit long.. perhaps I’ll split in to multiple at some point, making this an introductory posting and moving the details to a later posting. Preferences?)

Leave a comment

Filed under Accounting, Auditing, Financial Reporting, Sage 50 (formerly Peachtree), Software

Sage 50 – I See You

Sage 50 is my new/old favorite accounting software (besides PeopleSoft, of course).

Here is a great intro site: https://www.sage.com/en-us/products/sage-50/features/

I really like the structure that stays in place and is easy to navigate. I also really like the memorized transactions – to not re-invent the wheel every time and have best possible efficiencies.

The bank account reconciliation process is easy to use. I don’t love the absence of a list of reconciliations, to get to a past reconciliation screen you need to go back to that prior period, then open the bank reconciliation window. A bit indirect. But workable.

The reporting functions – I’ll have to tackle those in a later post. But you can drill down to the general ledger report behind any financial statement number, which is indispensable.

The inventory-related functionalities are well-designed. I haven’t used those recently, but I might play with them in a test environment to gain that awareness.

Sage 50 also integrates with all the 3rd party products, so you have all the options.

Sage 50 – my new home.

Leave a comment

Filed under Business, NonProfits, Resources, Sage 50 (formerly Peachtree), Technology

Accounting & Payroll Software

I completely am a RTFM-er, I always prefer to read up on things before getting in to them whenever possible, and to consult the current resources before asking questions.

Currently I work at the U of MN, in payroll, using PeopleSoft. The problem is, there is no FM! I mean, not for our implementation, that is complete and up-to-the-minute. For instance, the whole ESST thing is being added now, so that’s all new. Only just getting added to resources etc.

So at the U there are various resources to use instead, and help staff and audit reports to check on things and so on. It’s a whole complex system, and it’s really great. I enjoy working within it a great deal.

But much of my career has been in Accounting using that software, more. I’ve used some great programs – really have liked using Abila’s MIP and formerly Great Plains Accounting which is currently Microsoft Dynamics. I’ve also used Quickbooks a great deal, including some exposure to the online version (not a favorite). Also Peachtree, currently Sage 50.

And that is what this site will be focusing on – one of the main topics anyway. Sage 50, it’s use and optimization.

I’m looking forward to the journey!

Leave a comment

Filed under Accounting, Business, MIP (Abila), NonProfits, PeopleSoft, Quickbooks, Resources, Sage 50 (formerly Peachtree), Software, Technology