Tag Archives: finance

Sage 50 Budgeting Function

Using the budgeting function of Sage 50 (formerly Peachtree) is efficient and hassle-free.

The functionality is found under the Maintain menu, right below Chart of Accounts. You’ll open that window, and give your budget a name.

The quickest way to start is to use the ‘Autofill’ option in the top menu bar, which populates your current budget with some other data set. Options include using transaction data from Sage 50 (such as current year actual or actual of a prior year), or using budget data (from the current budget in process or some other budget). Using last year actual transaction data for instance, it fills in only those accounts with activity the prior year, with amounts equaling those prior year transaction, in the months that those transactions took place. Then you can modify those amounts.

The default user interface while you are in the budget is to present you with ‘quick action’ buttons – copy, save and adjust. The copy copies the amount in the cell you are in (or a group of cells you select), paste lets you paste that/those amount(s) in any other cells you choose. Adjust lets you modify the current cell contents in one of two ways: you can modify it by an amount you specify, or you can round that amount to the nearest dollar, or hundred dollars, or thousand dollars.

The other main expeditious way to start the budget process is to import the numbers from an existing spreadsheet. More on that in a later post.

Once you have a budget in place, you can use the provided income statements with budget data, modifying them (see earlier post) as needed. When you have multiple budgets in use, the initial window after you select a financial report gives you an opportunity to select which report to incorporate in to that report.

You can have multiple budgets for a given year, for instance an overall organizational budget as well as particular subset budgets, such as for particular projects or particular grants.

Ideally the organizational budget exactly matches the sum of all the subset budgets of course, but that is quite ambitious and labor-intensive. Especially since often the grant budgets (for instance) are for different periods than the fiscal year, and are very dependent on reality adhering to plan. When reality differs from the original plan, the grant budgets need to be modified as far as timing of amounts and amounts per category – at least internally in order to manage remaining spending (per category, or as a whole) to the budget. When the deviations from plan are significant (such as due to Covid, or a governmental shutdown), then the budget may need to be officially modified with the grant funds provider – perhaps extending the time period of the grant out farther, or reducing amounts allocated to travel and increasing other amounts.

Those project budget activities are necessary, often even to manage ‘small’ amounts. However the overall organizational budget is often not so fine-grained. A specific revenue line in the overall budget may consist of multiple grants, and changes in each of them may cancel out each other. Expense lines in the organizational budget may consist of amounts funded by grants as well as amounts funded by donations.

However when a finance person is talking to a program person about differences from budget, it is crucial that they both understand what budget they are talking about. The grant budgets need to be first priority and very actively managed. If a finance person is speaking about differences from the organizational budget, and the program person thinks they are talking about the project budget, consequences can be non-optimal.

More on budget functionalities in future posts!

Leave a comment

Filed under Accounting, Auditing, Business, Entrepreneurship, Financial Reporting, NonProfits, Sage 50 (formerly Peachtree), Software

From FinTech BootCamp – New Perspectives

Originally I’d wanted to go in to CSci many years ago, and so it’s been a lot of fun to get to check in via the boot camp, and get a glimpse of all that has gone on in other areas of finance during my career period. It seems like these days the technology is in some ways more accessible to a wider range of people besides those with formal academic preparation. To the extent that that’s the case, I plan to continue exploring topics of interest to me, especially in terms of the 30+ books I bought for the boot camp. And to use what I’ve learned in work settings whenever possible!

Career History -Computer includes Pascal use very long ago (Wumpus was fun, except for restricted access issues etc), Unix briefly during the very accelerated-time-days of the early internet, with protocol stacks and dear BBEdit and (very filtered) Slashdot and so much churning; a period working as an implementation consultant for Great Plains Dynamics back when installation took quite a while and was quite a thing (and answering a customers’ question about why didn’t it work last time, and would it for sure work this time? was not easy)(thank goodness for MacinTouch and the rest of the Mac community).. also using EDI and databases such as 4D and Access and FMP and lots of Mac based accounting systems.

Accounting has included full general ledger responsibilities such as reconciliations, journal entries, budgeting and budget reporting, financial reporting and audit/990 prep as well as the supporting day-to-day functionality, and related aspects such as accounting software optimization and implementation, database maintenance, payroll, benefits administration, human resources, sales tax compliance, etc..

What I like about accounting – it’s a lot. All the details, the utility of it (by definition, is necessary for every entity), and the close relationship w/ program software. Recently I’ve had the opportunity to think about accounting from a different perspective, and now I appreciate it more. It’s like a tapestry, in that each transaction is structured in the way that fits the entities involved (so 2 or more structures in place each time – one on each end); in each case, there may be 10 – 30 data elements involved per transaction. Then, that info is stored in the accounting software, and is acesssed in part or in whole, individually or collectively, depending on the context and info needs of the entity. Each transaction is summarized into multiple groups of similar transactions, by potentially some-all of those 5 – 30 data elements. It is included in reports in various ways, that meet the needs of the entity’s leaders & managers. The transaction is structured in such a way as to comply with all relevant federal, state and local rules, laws and regulations, as well as GAAP and other regulation systems. Finally, both the software data and the paper records are retained for specific periods of time, depending on the type and context of that transaction. While a small set of transactions / reports need to be permanently maintained, most are able to be released/deleted after some time (again, for each participant of each transaction). And then transparency/confidentiality: All info is available to governing entities/ compliance bodies; as well as managers/owners/directors, and specific people per role etc. To everyone else, all info is generally kept confidential. It’s an ongoing interlaced, intricate, complex system, which I really enjoy participating in.

Also, I have to say, I really appreciate good accounting software, and would be excited to join that sort of process as well. Hopeful about that in the future. This post was taken from my profile on GitHub, from that BootCamp experience. It was great fun dabbling in those software processes – until it got to the chains of blocks part (written that way to avoid search engine discovery).. I lost interest at that point, except for occasional episodes of disbelief and skepticism; and renewed appreciation for all I’d taken for granted in traditional Accounting.

Leave a comment

Filed under Accounting, Software